Mifare Hack

Back


Security flaw in Mifare Classic RFID applications exposed. See for more information, including the paper "Dismantling MIFARE Classic" with all details.

Channel: Science & Technology
Uploaded: March 12, 2008 at 11:48 am
Author: DigitalSecurityRUN

Length: 00:01:57
Rating: 4.92
Views: 102125

Tags: Mifare RFID Hack

Video Comments:
YDsixstring (December 4, 2008 at 7:53 pm)
jsommerlad: I agree with you, but what many people who view this video fail to realize is that RFID itself is not to blame here. The "implementation" is flawed. As you point out, the system SHOULD only let one person through but it's obviously not doing that.
jsommerlad (November 3, 2008 at 2:56 am)
wats the point of giving multiple people the cards? only one person can be in the building at once
andrewbnkjv (October 30, 2008 at 9:26 pm)
Security guard seems as useless as the key card.
djbanizza (October 23, 2008 at 12:44 am)
Is this the MIFARE Classic version? What about the DES, 3DES version - is it secure?
DigitalSecurityRUN (October 24, 2008 at 12:15 am)
Yes, this is about the Mifare Classic. We have no information on the DESFire.
darthspeaks (September 10, 2008 at 10:01 pm)
This shit is so fucking easy to hack it's not funny. It's the dim witted dumb fucks that think they need to stop thinking once they get out of school that don't get it. I have got into almost every computer lab on many different campuses and planted so much shit by doing this very thing (well something very much like it). It was funny when everyone got Fs in Chemistry right before Spring Break... hehe
control2970 (August 9, 2008 at 10:03 pm)
NICE
realmahadeo (August 7, 2008 at 9:23 am)
haha, good catch
OlandezBukovinian (July 25, 2008 at 3:49 am)
That depends on who is going to do what with it. Russian mafia copying millions of Oyster cards in London and selling them at busstops would make it worth it...
YDsixstring (December 4, 2008 at 7:50 pm)
My point is not whether or not it's worth it (of course it is). The point is that RFID is NOT the culprit, it's poor IMPLEMENTATIONS that give the technology a bad rap.