Evolution IS a Blind Watchmaker

Back


READ THIS
In this video I deconstruct the broken watch straw man argument used by creationist / ID supporters to attack evolution. I had to pack a ton of information into this video so you WILL need to pause it periodically.

The basic premise of the argument is that a bunch of parts will never randomly assemble into the correct arrangement to form a properly functioning complex. Once again, creationists / ID supporters miss the basic concept of evolution entirely. No biologists believes, nor is there any evidence that complex systems form spontaneously in one fell swoop. That would be creation. Systems evolve through many intermediates, one step at a time, slowly building up the complexity.

Here I deconstruct their straw man argument. Basically, I simulate clocks as living organisms. Selective pressure is focused on their ability to accurately tell time. NO goal is imposed on the design (you can tell this because every simulation ends with a differently constructed clock). And it works. Clocks evolve through a series of transitional forms: Pendulum, Proto-clock, 1-handed Clock, 2-handed Clock, 3-handed Clock, and 4-handed Clock. Gradually the complexity is built up.

These labels I have assigned to the transitional forms have nothing to do with the simulation itself. They are names I assigned so that we could analyze what the population was doing. The clocks are just clocks, living in their world, trying to tell time as accurately as possible.

One thing I wanted to address but didn't have time in the video is how rapid the transitional period can be. In some simulations the population goes from pendulums to 3-handed Clocks in a hundred or so generations. And the transitions between the transitional forms are even more rapid, happening in about ten generations. Chances are none or a very limited representation of that transition will be preserved in the fossil record.

One thing I should add. The program does not draw the clocks. It maintains, mates, and simulates them, but the drawing must be done manually from the genome matrix.

The program is written in MatLab.

The hand rotations that begin with 86 are 86,000 not 86.000. When YouTube compressed the video it becam hard to tell a comma from a period.

To download this video go to:


To download the program go to:


If you wish to translate this video you can download the PowerPoint file from:


Learn the facts, spread the truth, and most importantly, Think About It.

Channel: Howto & Style
Uploaded: June 5, 2007 at 7:25 am
Author: cdk007

Length: 00:09:48
Rating: 4.67
Views: 204402

Tags: Intelligent Design ID Creationism Wrong Mutation Natural Selection Irreducible Complexity Experiment Education Straw Man

Video Comments:
Cnidarious (January 7, 2009 at 11:14 pm)
i think your concept of intelligence is deeply flawed, as is your concept of sentience.
your mind is a product of your body, its not going to exist without it. If i take a piece of your brain out your going to act different.
intelligence of any kind is not Infallible.
that being said a human intelligence is little more then a complex biochemical process and nothing else.
Cnidarious (January 7, 2009 at 10:37 pm)
.....
what?
wow is your first language even English?
Now your personifying it!
WTF?
ID is the bible a theist?
intelligentDIVINE (January 7, 2009 at 10:33 pm)
evolution is an atheist
intelligentDIVINE (January 7, 2009 at 10:32 pm)
proof of creation on you tube
every post on you tube refutes evolution as an act of intelligent design without the need to wait billions of years for an atheist chump to evolve and learn to post a rebuttal!

paragraphs do not have genes or reproduce>>JACKoff

very observant for a chump with chimp envy

however that fact also refutes evolution which could never respond to any of my eg.s of creation! through a simple post on you tube! or is that
yet another act of creation on you tube
Cnidarious (January 7, 2009 at 9:49 pm)
ID your Spamming again.
you might consider stopping before you get kicked off the channel.
Cnidarious (January 7, 2009 at 9:47 pm)
sorry ID but your speaking nonsense again.
Talking on youtube is not a model of intelligent design.
Cnidarious (January 7, 2009 at 9:46 pm)
perhaps you do not understand why one has a ERV in the first place ID.
You do not ``catch them from lower lifeforms``
you have the so called lower lifeforms caught them, Mutated as a result then after much speciation there descendants and relatives share the mutation in common with another.
This is why we KNOW that we have an ancestor in common with other primates, because they share it the very same mutation.
intelligentDIVINE (January 7, 2009 at 9:37 pm)
proof of creation on you tube
every post on you tube refutes evolution as an act of intelligent design without the need to wait billions of years for an atheist chump to evolve and learn to post a rebuttal!

paragraphs do not have genes or reproduce>>JACKoff

very observant for a chump with chimp envy

however that fact also refutes evolution which could never respond to any of my eg.s of creation! through a simple post on you tube! or is that
yet another act of creation on you tube
intelligentDIVINE (January 7, 2009 at 9:36 pm)
proof of creation on you tube
every post on you tube refutes evolution as an act of intelligent design without the need to wait billions of years for an atheist chump to evolve and learn to post a rebuttal!

paragraphs do not have genes or reproduce>>JACKoff

very observant for a chump with chimp envy

however that fact also refutes evolution which could never respond to any of my eg.s of creation! through a simple post on you tube! or is that
yet another act of creation on you tube
intelligentDIVINE (January 7, 2009 at 9:33 pm)
lol neither are ervs transferrable to humans from lower inferior lifeforms.
but that does not mean that humankind and the animal kingdoms both dont age get sick and die a physical death.function requires purpose you have none